Advertisement
Hey--
I just got this email from a guy I was supposed to meet...2 hours later. We had talked on the phone a few times and while I do have some issues (dont we all?), he completely missed mine (namely, I am a consultant, not unemployed). Anyone have some good thoughts on how I should reply to him?
thanks,
n
Hi,
Sorry, can't make it tonight. Aside from being way too much of a hastle--going to Pac Bell park at that time, not to mention parking and then leaving--is too stressful for a first meeting. It's really overdoing what should be a casual meeting at a quiet place for an hour, or two. Also, we just wouldn't be compatible: you're still reveling in small freedoms like
legal drinking and no curfew; those are well and good, but were, for me, the pervue of my early twenties, not early thirties. You're also unemployed,which means I'd always have to pay for everything. Being hyper-ideological
is a (classic Jewish) sign of issues of control, self-esteem and, especialy,unresolved family-related (esp. father-centered) issues. Too much baggage for someone like me who's learned to let go things I can't control.
We wouldnt be compatible for any length of time and time, being my only real asset, is something I can't waste.
Thanks for the conversation, though.
Taylor
I just got this email from a guy I was supposed to meet...2 hours later. We had talked on the phone a few times and while I do have some issues (dont we all?), he completely missed mine (namely, I am a consultant, not unemployed). Anyone have some good thoughts on how I should reply to him?
thanks,
n
Hi,
Sorry, can't make it tonight. Aside from being way too much of a hastle--going to Pac Bell park at that time, not to mention parking and then leaving--is too stressful for a first meeting. It's really overdoing what should be a casual meeting at a quiet place for an hour, or two. Also, we just wouldn't be compatible: you're still reveling in small freedoms like
legal drinking and no curfew; those are well and good, but were, for me, the pervue of my early twenties, not early thirties. You're also unemployed,which means I'd always have to pay for everything. Being hyper-ideological
is a (classic Jewish) sign of issues of control, self-esteem and, especialy,unresolved family-related (esp. father-centered) issues. Too much baggage for someone like me who's learned to let go things I can't control.
We wouldnt be compatible for any length of time and time, being my only real asset, is something I can't waste.
Thanks for the conversation, though.
Taylor
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 1:32 AMWhy reply to him? An episode from Sex and the City: Miranda discovers that if a guy doesn't call you (or doesn't wanna go out) means he "just isn't into you."
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 5:07 AMi agree with annette, you dont owe him a reply after an email like that. he seems like a tightass and seemed to enjoy pointing out all your [perceived] faults and rolling them into a stereotype or two. anyone willing to do that before even meeting someone probably isnt worth meeting or even talking to.
afterthought: is he even talking about you? (you said he completely missed your issues and thought you were unemployed.)
either way, with an attitude like his, i think *he* would be wasting *your* time. you can do much better. :-)
[im also ignoring the fact that he didnt bother to break the date beforehand, thats terribly rude no matter what the situation.] -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 8:41 AMI was just going to say almost exactly what Dave said.. Instead, I'll just agree with Dave.
He's probably looking at someone else's profile or some such... I ALWAYS reserve judgement until actually meeting and talking with someone. This guy is obviously wrongly reading stuff into who you are and making snap judgements based on his incorrect frame of reference. Don't bother with him. It'd be more trouble than it's worth in the long run. -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 9:10 AMNoelle, what a yutz! You're better off not meeting this turkey and spending time with your friends, your pets, or your tv.
Good-bye and good riddance.
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 9:12 AMNoelle,
Thanks for sharing this. My advice would be to continue being who you are with everyone and everything and not worry about anything else, I know it can be easier said then done sometimes.
You will find the person when you are totaly being the loving beautiful woman that you are.
The guy in the email is a blessing in disguise, it sounds like he doesn't fit into your life so you can let him go, he exposed alot of information.
Tracy
-
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 10:20 AMNoelle, this guy is a DOA. Good thing you didn't meet! Don't even waste your time with a reply (if you are able)..Sometimes, emotions can get the better of us but I've done much better when I immediately delete that annoying e-mail.
Stay true to what's best about you and keep searching for a new fish.
-
Blissful goings
Mon, August 9, 2004 - 1:43 PMFirstly, I'd like to apologize to the readers in this thread for the tone of this post. Its not my intention to offend anyone unnecessarily. Its not all good but its how I feel about this particular thread at the moment. Yes, I have a leaky soul...don't hangout with me or you're libel to catch it too.
Hi Noelle,
Here is my deconstructive and hopefully not too damaging analysis of the issues at hand...
> Hey--
>
>I just got this email from a guy I was supposed to
>meet...2 hours later. We had talked on the phone a few
>times and while I do have some issues (dont we all?),
>he completely missed mine (namely, I am a consultant,
>not unemployed). Anyone have some good thoughts on how
noelle, your profile on tribe indicated/indicates that you are indeed unemployed.
>I should reply to him?
Yes. I think you should thank him for pointing out an error in your profile and then take action to correct it. More on how to respond to him, assuming *your* profile is accurate. Right now, it sez you are 38 and unemployed...
>thanks,
>n
Actually, no thanks are necessary or desired. I'm only doing this as an educational and humorous exercise. The following is how I think you, noelle, should respond to be totally honest with us, your readers.
>Hi,
>
>Sorry, can't make it tonight. Aside from being way too
Tee hee. Taylor, you are an ass!
>much of a hastle--going to Pac Bell park at that time,
'Hastle' is not a word. However, I appreciate that you often talk to yourself in your head where spelling is less important. That's probably how most of your acquaintences think of you anyway. It does indeed rhyme with another term I can think of though, so thanks for the clue!
>not to mention parking and then leaving--is too
>stressful for a first meeting. It's really overdoing
Taylor, you are lame and undependable. I thank you for deciding for me that it was not worth meeting. I believe you are right for the foreseeable future in that respect.
>what should be a casual meeting at a quiet place for an
>hour, or two. Also, we just wouldn't be compatible:
No shit, Surelame. We are definitely not compatible. I am thankful that we will not breed and hopeful that you have not nor never will...at least not until you've gotten professional help anyway.
>you're still reveling in small freedoms like
>legal drinking and no curfew; those are well and good,
>but were, for me, the pervue of my early twenties, not
>early thirties. You're also unemployed,which means I'd
Taylor, I'll gladly enjoy whatever vices I enjoy without you from now on--thanks for the heads up...if that's even possible in your case.
As for being unemployed, well, I am correcting my profile to indicate that I am actually doing consulting. So, Internet stalker that you probably are, you should make a screenshot of my profile before I do change it. That way, there will be continuing evidence of my mistake. That way, whenever you become teary eyed over out "relationship" you can have something to remember me by and smile about until you tear up again.
>always have to pay for everything. Being
Uh, Stupid, who do you think paid for me to get to [whereever it was noelle was supposed to meet Taylor]? In fact, you owe me precisely [the actual amount of time, pain, and suffering incurred, including Internet minutes, phone calls to family and friends, etc--not itemized of course] for wasting my time. If you can't pay now, that's fantastic! I don't really want to have any further transactions with you after you recieve this email.
>hyper-ideological
>is a (classic Jewish) sign of issues of control,
>self-esteem and, especialy,unresolved family-related
>(esp. father-centered) issues. Too much baggage for
WTF?! I imply that I'm Asian in my noelle profile--why can't you get that straight?! Jeesh!
>someone like me who's learned to let go things I can't
>control.
You mean like maybe addressing your emails properly? Or do you mean with regard to treating fellow human beings like extensions of your mental gymnastics olympics?
>We wouldnt be compatible for any length of time and
>time, being my only real asset, is something I can't
>waste.
I hope that you continue to wonder about what time of day it is and that people continue to refuse to give it to you...until you get professional help that is. And don't misinterperet what I'm saying about the professional help thing either. I think you should layoff sex until you've got your other problems ironed out--save your money for therapy, numbnut.
>Thanks for the conversation, though.
I was so prepared to give you a chance, you low-life no good, internet slimeball licking member of the Church of Latter Day Singles. Thanks for showing your true colors at this time, rather than actually touching me. My skin shivers at the thought--but not in the way you frequently imagine while holding your little partner--assuming you are actually a man that is.
>Taylor
>reply to this post
No problem. Let me know if you'd like me to send over some of my cousins to kick you ass. Its not the therapy I truly believe you need, but I feel it would be entertaining nonetheless.
Oh, and if you are going to continue to stalk me via the Internet, I'll get some folks I know at FKO to curse your computer...unless they've already done that already. You know how they like to read my personal email and all. My apologies to your mother if you are using borrowing hers. I didn't mean to bring her into this but, when some lame guy's around, some of their loved ones are also liable to recieve collateral damage from Taylor-ade nascisstic fantasmigorical fantasies.
Yours truly,
Frankly Moving On
---
Disclaimer: I am not noelle and probably, even likely, have never met her...if she is a her. -
-
Re: Blissful goings
Tue, August 10, 2004 - 2:04 AMtimbo, no offense but that is stupid!
noelle, have fun and just be love and not the same stupidity as others, there is no need and in today's time we need people to stop reacting and start responding to what matters vs revenging some mistruth! like i said, he was a belssing in disguise. go for what you really want!!!!!! -
-
Re: Blissful goings
Wed, August 11, 2004 - 12:24 PMNo offense taken. I agree with everything you've just said.
-
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Wed, August 11, 2004 - 12:36 PM -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Wed, August 18, 2004 - 2:04 AMum, what was the purpose of this link? is it just spam for your blog? utterly lame, if it is.
> August 11, 2004 - 12:36 PM
> Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
> www.kbcafe.com/iBLOGthere4iM/
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Wed, August 18, 2004 - 5:35 PMso noelle,
what did you finally do... -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Thu, August 19, 2004 - 10:17 PMShared the email with a lot of people...had some good laughs and moved on. Glad I never met him! -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Fri, August 20, 2004 - 12:41 PMexactly!
-
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Fri, September 17, 2004 - 8:49 PMHey N,
The guy is a headcase and well someone whom may have trouble finding anyone compatible, ever.
The great thing about dating or online dating is that there are plenty of other options.
Keep plugging away, and do what I reccommend doing, look for the basics, chat a bit, make a call and make a coffee date. He was right that the first meeting should be casual. While I don't disagree that the suggested first date would have been fun, I think a no strings, cheap coffee date is the best way to get to know someone.
Good Luck!!
-Steve -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Tue, September 21, 2004 - 10:48 PMcheap coffee date....heheheheheheheheeheheheheheehhehhhhhehehehehehhehehehhheheheheehehe - funny! -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Tue, September 21, 2004 - 11:36 PMI don't get it. Did you get a happy pill while the rest of us weren't looking? -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Thu, September 23, 2004 - 7:02 PMsteve had said in the previous post...'While I don't disagree that the suggested first date would have been fun, I think a no strings, cheap coffee date is the best way to get to know someone.'
i just have to laugh - cheap coffee date...god that sounds sooo unattractive and i think it is funny to say cheap! i had to laugh!
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Fri, September 24, 2004 - 8:56 AMYou got lucky this guy didn't enter your life!!!!
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Fri, September 24, 2004 - 11:47 PMWhat kind of first date do you prefer, Tracy?
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Sat, September 25, 2004 - 2:14 PMI'd much rather have coffee or tea or whatever with someone on the first date because if it sucks, you have an easier out than if you went to lunch with someone.
My last lunch date didn't offer to pay for both of us. It kinda bugged me, but not as much as his lack of being upfront in the first place. I would have appreciated it if he had just said "let's go dutch on this" before we ordered our food. I kept my order in the price range I'd be willing to pay just in case we went dutch.
So Tracy, you are in the "30 something" age range, how do you keep first dates from being a job interview as opposed to being fun? -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Sat, September 25, 2004 - 6:57 PMawesome question beth.
first off: i just think the word 'cheap' really disclosed a lot and it made me think of a few things.
1. it pissed me off - like why be cheap! ya know. i have bought sandwiches for the homeless - do you think it paid off! yes i did in many ways. so.
2. i thought of the power of language; i just like to hear people speak with a little more respect and appreciation in the world. conversations like 'cheap date' lend to repsonses like, 'he should be lucky'. vs we went for a great latte and wow we talked for hours..something like that!
3. i still like to be courted but that is just a desire and not a standard.
as far as beth's question:
the date is fun when i am fun and when i am serious, the date is serious, when i am interviewing the date is an interview...see my point! i donot date guys that are not my type - i so have a type - it is not set in stone but gosh, there is a certain type of guy that i get turned on physically, energetically and then so on...
being in your 30's and i am 36 is a hard age to date for me mostly b/c i am not just looking for sex and when i am looking for sex - trust me it is just sex and that is not needed all the time and when think okay, i am ready for a relationship and i start to make my list and be open and do and be a certain way to cause what i want then i start to become picky and that limits who i date so i hardly date to date unless i am looking for fun or thinking i am ready for a relationship...
yeah?
wookin pa nub! hehehe....
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Sun, September 26, 2004 - 9:32 AMI find it hard to remember that you are supposed to be having FUN getting to know someone. Hence the reference to the whole job interview.
I know women that are younger than me (32-33) and they are on a MANHUNT which to me is a total turnoff. Desperation is never a pretty thing in a man or a woman.
I find it hard to be remember to be flexible on certain things but remember I do have my own limits as well. I know what I need and want. I had one of the most adult converstations about this type of thing with a male on tribe.
There were just 2 things I couldn't work through that he valued and wasn't willing to change his mind on. It was just refreshing to have that kind of conversation even if it was on email. It was honest and open.
I wish that would happen more often even if the turnout isn't what I had hoped for.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Fri, September 24, 2004 - 9:01 AMWhat a fucking idiot!
Pass~
Next!!! -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, September 27, 2004 - 6:43 PMwho is an idiot! the original guy that was talked about in this thread? -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, September 27, 2004 - 11:54 PMYes. He's an idiot. He deserves to be alone. Don't want to promote re-population of assholes like him. -
-
Re: Classic Online Dating Story - Would Love your feedback!
Mon, September 27, 2004 - 11:57 PMoh well, i have been one myself from time to time..
-
-
-